Movie remakes, upcoming film. We've got all the info you'll need on your favorite teen celebrities, TV shows and new. ![]() Max Landis is penning a remake of his father John Landis' seminal horror. 119 movie remakes and reboots currently in the. Night of the Horror Remakes. Brad Fuller from his office at Michael Bay’s Platinum Dunes production. The 5 Best & 5 Worst Horror Movie Remakes. The 5 Best & 5 Worst Horror Movie Remakes. Back to IndieWire News. Joel Silver’s Dark House production shingle. We found over 30 remakes and sequels that as of right now are either about to be released, in production. As horror movie fans. The production company Dark Castle Entertainment. Posted by Bloody Disgusting on Monday. Here are 10 examples of movie remakes that are widely considered better than the originals. 10 Movie Remakes That Are Much Better. 10 Horror Movie Remakes That Are Better Than the. 10 Horror Movie Remakes That Are Better Than the Originals. 30 Ridiculously Awesome Horror Movie Titles. Hammer Film Productions - Wikipedia. Hammer Film Productions is a British film production company based in London. Founded in 1. 93. Gothic . Hammer also produced science fiction, thrillers, film noir and comedies — and, in later years, television series. During its most successful years, Hammer dominated the horror film market, enjoying worldwide distribution and considerable financial success. This success was due, in part, to distribution partnerships with major United States studios, such as Warner Bros. During the late 1. American funding forced changes to the previously lucrative Hammer formula, with varying degrees of success. The company eventually ceased production in the mid- 1. In 2. 00. 0, the studio was bought by a consortium including advertising executive and art collector Charles Saatchi and publishing millionaires Neil Mendoza and William Sieghart. The new owners also acquired the Hammer group's film library, consisting of 2. Simon Oakes, who took over as CEO of Hammer, said: . The brand is still alive but no one has invested in it for a long time. It was housed in a three- room office suite at Imperial House, Regent Street, London. The company name came from Hinds' stage name, Will Hammer, which he had taken from the area of London in which he lived, Hammersmith. Work began almost immediately on the first film, The Public Life of Henry the Ninth at the MGM/ATP studios, with filming concluding on 2 January 1. The film tells the story of Henry Henry, an unemployed London street musician, and the title was a . Hammer produced four films distributed by Exclusive: A slump in the British film industry forced Hammer into bankruptcy and the company went into liquidation in 1. Exclusive survived and on 2. July 1. 93. 7 purchased the leasehold on 1. Wardour Street, and continued to distribute films made by other companies. Resurrection (1. 93. Hammer Film Productions. At the outbreak of World War II, James Carreras and Anthony Hinds left to join the armed services and Exclusive continued to operate in a limited capacity. In 1. 94. 6, James Carreras rejoined the company after demobilisation. He resurrected Hammer as the film production arm of Exclusive with a view to supplying 'quota- quickies' - cheaply made domestic films designed to fill gaps in cinema schedules and support more expensive features. He convinced Anthony Hinds to rejoin the company, and a revived 'Hammer Film Productions' set to work on Death in High Heels, The Dark Road, and Crime Reporter. Not able to afford top stars, Hammer acquired the film rights to BBC radio series such as The Adventures of PC 4. Dick Barton: Special Agent (an adaptation of the successful Dick Barton radio show). During the production of Dick Barton Strikes Back (1. For the next production – Dr Morelle - The Case of the Missing Heiress (another radio adaptation) – Hammer rented Dial Close, a 2. River Thames, at Cookham Dean, Maidenhead. Hammer moved into the Exclusive offices in 1. Wardour Street, and the building was rechristened . Five films were produced there: Man in Black (1. Room to Let (1. 94. Someone at the Door (1. What the Butler Saw (1. The Lady Craved Excitement (1. In 1. 95. 0, Hammer moved again to Gilston Park, a country club in Harlow Essex, which hosted The Black Widow, The Rossiter Case, To Have and to Hold and The Dark Light (all 1. In 1. 95. 1 Hammer began shooting at its best- remembered base, Down Place, on the banks of the Thames (later known as Bray Studios). The company signed a one- year lease and began its 1. Cloudburst. The house, virtually derelict, required substantial work, but it did not have the construction restrictions that had prevented Hammer from customizing previous homes. A decision was made to remodel Down Place into a substantial, custom- fitted studio complex. The expansive grounds were used for almost all later location shooting in Hammer's films, and are a key to the 'Hammer look'. Also in 1. 95. 1, Hammer and Exclusive signed a four- year production and distribution contract with Robert Lippert, an American film producer. The contract meant that Lippert and Exclusive effectively exchanged products for distribution on their respective sides of the Atlantic – beginning in 1. The Last Page and ending with Women Without Men (AKA Prison Story, 1. It was Lippert's insistence on an American star in the Hammer films he was to distribute that led to the prevalence of American leads in many of the company's productions during the 1. It was for The Last Page that Hammer made a significant appointment when they hired film director Terence Fisher, who played a critical role in the forthcoming horror cycle. Toward the end of 1. Down Place expired, and with its growing success Hammer looked towards more conventional studio- based productions. A dispute with the Association of Cinematograph Technicians blocked this proposal, and instead the company purchased the freehold of Down Place. The house was renamed Bray Studios after the nearby village of Bray and it remained as Hammer's principal base until 1. In 1. 95. 3 the first of Hammer's science fiction films, Four Sided Triangle and Spaceways, were released. Hammer Horror contributors. Directors and writers. Michael Carreras, sometimes as Henry Younger - writer and director of The Curse of the Mummy's Tomb and director/producer of The Lost Continent. Terence Fisher - director of Dracula, The Curse of Frankenstein, The Mummy and others. Freddie Francis - director of The Evil of Frankenstein and Dracula has Risen From the Grave. Tudor Gates - writer of The Vampire Lovers, Lust for a Vampire, and Twins of Evil. John Gilling - writer and director of Shadow of the Cat (1. The Plague of the Zombies (1. The Reptile (1. 96. The Mummy's Shroud. Anthony Hinds, as John Elder - writer of The Brides of Dracula, The Curse of the Werewolf and others. Jimmy Sangster - writer of Dracula, The Curse of Frankenstein and others; director of The Horror of Frankenstein and Lust for a Vampire. Peter Sasdy - director of Taste the Blood of Dracula and Countess Dracula. Harry Robertson - musical director of Countess Dracula, Twins of Evil and others. Other crew. The scores for many Hammer horror films, including Dracula and The Curse of Frankenstein, were composed by James Bernard. Production designer. Bernard Robinson and cinematographer. Jack Asher were instrumental in creating the lavish look of the early Hammer films, usually on a very restricted budget. Actors. Hammer's horror films featured many of the same actors in recurring roles; these actors are sometimes called the . As a consequence of the contract with Robert Lippert, American actor Brian Donlevy was imported for the lead role and the title was changed to The Quatermass Xperiment to cash in on the new X certificate for horror films. The film was unexpectedly popular, and led to the popular 1. Quatermass 2 – again adapted from one of Kneale's television scripts, this time by Kneale and with a budget double that of the original: . In the meantime, Hammer produced another Quatermass style horror film, X the Unknown, originally intended as part of the series until Kneale denied them the rights. At the time, Hammer voluntarily submitted scripts to the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC) for comment before production. Regarding the script of X the Unknown, one reader/examiner (Audrey Field) commented on 2. November. In fact, someone will almost certainly have been sick. We must have a great deal more restraint, and much more done by onlookers' reactions instead of by shots of 'pulsating obscenity', hideous scars, hideous sightless faces, etc, etc. It is keeping on and on in the same vein that makes this script so outrageous. They must take it away and prune. Before they take it away, however, I think the President . I have a stronger stomach than the average (for viewing purposes) and perhaps I ought to be reacting more strongly. They eventually entered talks with Associated Artists Productions (a. Eliot Hyman. During this period, two young American filmmakers, Max J. Rosenberg and Milton Subotsky, who later established Hammer's rival Amicus, submitted to a. Although interested in the script, a. Eliot Hyman however, sent the script to his contact at Hammer. Rosenberg would often claim he 'produced' Curse of Frankenstein, an exaggeration repeated in his obituary. Although the novel by Mary Shelley was long since in the public domain, Anthony Hinds was unsure about the script, as Subotsky's script adhered closely to the plot of the 1. Universal film Son of Frankenstein, featuring a second- generation Baron Frankenstein emulating his father, the original monster- maker. This put the project at risk of a copyright infringement lawsuit by Universal. In addition a great deal of polishing and additional material was needed, as the short script had an estimated running time of just 5. UK. Accordingly, comments on the script from Hammer's Michael Carreras (who had joined his father James as producer in the early 1. The sets are not marked clearly on the shot headings, neither is DAY or NIGHT specified in a number of cases. The number of set- ups scripted is quite out of proportion to the length of the screenplay, and we suggest that your rewrites are done in master scene form. Plans were made to shoot the film in Eastmancolor – a decision which caused worry at the BBFC. Not only did the script contain horror and graphic violence, but it would be portrayed in vivid colour. The project was handed to Tony Hinds who was less impressed with the script than Michael Carreras, and whose vision for the film was a simple black- and- white 'quickie' made in three weeks. Concerned that Subotsky and Rosenberg's script had too many similarities to the Universal films, Hinds commissioned Jimmy Sangster to rewrite it as The Curse of Frankenstein. Sangster's treatment impressed Hammer enough to rescue the film from the 'quickie' treadmill and to produce it as a colour film. Sangster submitted his script to the BBFC for examination. Audrey Field reported on 1. October 1. 95. 6. Upcoming Movie Remakes (Yep, 5. Hey, who needs new ideas when there are already so many great old ideas waiting to be rediscovered? With that in mind, we've compiled a list of 5. Because if these films were good the first time, you never know, you might just enjoy them even more the second time around. Better news for fans: . Karl Urban (. First- time director and former stuntman Dan Bradley has kept the rest of the premise intact, so expect to see plenty of heroics from America's youth as they lead a Midwestern resistance against our commie foes. This film was completed in 2. MGM; with Hemsworth becoming a star, though, it may finally see the light of dawn, so to speak. Release Date/Year: November 2. Carrie'Attached: Chloe Grace Moretz, Julianne Moore. Status: Back in 1. Sissy Spacek being doused with pig's blood by a- hole high school students and then taking her revenge through the therapeutic application of telekinesis. Considering how iconic that film has become in the annals of horror movies, remaking it will be a tall task, but MGM has taken a big step in the right direction by signing on . And the director is someone who knows a thing or two about the difficulties that face girls growing up these days; Kimberly Peirce, who directed . Yep: 3. 0- plus years after Sam Raimi's original . Here's a word of advice, Jane: Speak softly and carry a big boomstick. Release Date/Year: April 1. Jackson, Gary Oldman. Status: Things are moving along rapidly on this remake of the classic 1. Jose Padilha lining up a slew of superstars for the production, including Samuel L. Jackson and Gary Oldman. We'd buy that for a dollar! Release Date/Year: August 9, 2. All Quiet on the Western Front'Attached: Daniel Radcliffe (rumored)Status: Winner of the Academy Award for Best Picture and Best Director, the 1. Cool as it is, though, that adaptation of Erich Remarque's classic novel about the horrors of trench warfare during World War I didn't feature Harry Potter. This one may not, either: Daniel Radcliffe had been attached, but now has apparently moved on, while the film has signed on director Mimi Leder (. Whether she can talk Radcliffe into coming back remains to be seen. Release Date: 2. 01. But Smith isn't the only big name attached to the remake of the 1. Will Smith, co- producing alongside Jay- Z, but Emma Thompson is also on board as the original screenwriter, though rewrites have since been ordered. Sounds like a winner. Release Date/Year: 2. A Star Is Born'Attached: Beyonc. Then star Beyonc. Still, now that her baby bump is an actual baby, things should take off again, maybe even in time for a 2. Release Date/Year: 2. Mad Max: Fury Road'Attached: Tom Hardy, Charlize Theron, Nicholas Hoult, Zo. Gibson isn't expected to appear in the film, which may be a good thing considering his current status as Hollywood pariah. Filming is currently underway. Release Date/Year: 2. Oldboy'Attached: Elizabeth Olsen (rumored), Josh Brolin, Sharlto Copley. Status: Spike Lee might not be the first name that pops into your head when you think of Korean thrillers, but that's about to change, as Brooklyn's most famous rabble- rousing cinematic auteur is set to remake the 2. One of the most intriguing and unlikely remakes in recent memory. Release Date/Year: 2. Pet Sematary'Attached: N/AStatus: Stephen King's classic horror novel . Alexandre Aja (. Who will direct and star in the remake is yet to be determined, but we'll know soon enough. Alcon Entertainment has put the movie on their fast track, and they hope to land a director as soon as possible to rush the film into production for a 2. Release Date/Year: 2. Director Javier Gutierrez and writer Jesse Witugow are hard at work crafting a 2. Don't worry, . Little- known director Mark Pellington takes over as director, but don't worry; del Toro is producing again from a script he co- wrote. Release Date/Year: 2. An American Werewolf in London'Attached: N/AStatus: Producer Sean Furst knows a thing or two about horror remakes, having helped bring . He and his brother, co- producer Bryan Furst, have optioned . Decisions about cast and crew are awaiting the script's completion. Release Date/Year: 2. This time around, Rose Mc. Gowan was originally rumored to be taking on the lead role, but appears to have moved on; meanwhile, screenwriter Joe Gazzam is hard at work on a script. Best of all, Nicolas Winding Refn, the mastermind behind the cult hit . Also back for another go- round is Brad Dourif, who will once again provide the voice of Chucky. This film was originally slated to be made in 2. Universal is hedging on whether the film will be made at all, which is why the expected release date is now 2. Release Date/Year: 2. Death Note'Attached: N/AStatus: The good news for Warner Bros. Plus, the original story, about a guy who finds an evil notebook that kills anyone whose name is written inside it, has proven to be popular in everything from manga to anime to live action. Still, no stars are attached and the script is currently being rewritten, which explains why they had to push the release date back from next summer to sometime in 2. Release Date/Year: 2. Drop Dead Fred'Attached: Russell Brand. Status: When . But Universal thinks it can top the original's $1. Russell Brand, who is set to play the title character in a new version penned by former . In a sign that hell has frozen over, though, producer Steve Golin (. Assuming the Mayans don't blow up the Earth first. Release Date/Year: 2. Starship Troopers'Attached: N/AStatus: . In fact, a fourth installment in the series about soldiers fighting space bugs in a future created by sci- fi author Robert Heinlein is due to arrive on Blu- ray this month. Still, since only hardcore fans have hung around for every direct- to- DVD travesty since the original came out in 1. Unless you're a space bug. Release Date/Year: 2. Still, he has the experience to help untangle the complex legal issues regarding the film rights, and with Leonardo Di. Caprio also on board as an executive producer, . Note: Tom Cruise recently signed on to headline a remake of . Our head hurts. Release Date/Year: 2. War. Games'Attached: Status: Coming off of . The one he decided to go with? Remaking the 1. 98. This might be the remake that makes the most sense ever, as today's technology has finally caught up with the concept. They're still working on a script, but you know what they say: Give an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of i. Pads .. Release Date/Year: 2. Time Bandits'Attached: N/AStatus: Handmade Films is once again trying to put together a remake of the beloved (and totally weird) 1. The studio has been trying to get this thing going since 2. Hey, if they can time travel, this shouldn't be an issue, right? Release Date/Year: 2. Akira'Attached: Garrett Hedlund and Ken Watanbe were attached, but.. Status: Katsuhiro Otomo's 1. The cartoon, though, only covered a small portion of the original comic book series, something Warner Bros. Just when Akira and company will finally spring to life (or live action, anyway) is now up in the air once again. Release Date/Year: Unknown. Now the remake is being headed by . That seems like a reasonable choice, but nothing else has yet been nailed down about this remake, which is still in the early stages. Kevin Hart is supposedly attached, though, so that gives a hint about the new direction being taken. Release Date/Year: Unknown'American Psycho'Attached: N/AStatus: It's barely been a decade since the original . Noble Lincoln Jones is set to make his directorial debut in this ultra low- budget remake. Sounds a little .. What it doesn't have yet is a greenlight from Universal, which explains why the original 2. The main sticking point: Trying to come up with scary ways for birds to kill people is apparently beyond the studio's current imagination. For a film that's been in development for nearly six years now, what's a couple more between friends? Release Date/Year: Unknown'Commando'Attached: Writer- director David Ayer. Scoop: . He's also eager to direct it. For now, though, 2. Century Fox is still trying to find an actor who can fill The Governator's shoes. It could be a long wait. Release Date: Unknown'Creature From the Black Lagoon'Attached: Channing Tatum (rumored)Status: . When he'll have the time is an issue, though, so there's not even a tentative release date on this one yet. Release Date/Year: Unknown'Death Wish'Attached: Robert Downey Jr. Status: Ever since Charles Bronson's original . Sly Stallone had been attached as director and star, but that's been put on hold for the time being. He's even talking about having Robert Downey Jr. Count us among the cautiously optimistic. Release Date/Year: Unknown. Olyphant and Cooper are currently under consideration to take over Kurt Russell's role as one- eyed badass Snake Plissken, but no deal has yet been signed with either. Plus, New Line dropped out, leaving Breck with everything except a studio where he can make the movie. Which is a problem. Release Date/Year: Unknown'Heavy Metal'Attached: Jack Black. Status: David Fincher leads a legion of high- profile directors trying to pull together this anthology remake of the 1. James Cameron, Zack Snyder, Gore Verbinski and Kevin Eastman are just some of the other directors in the mix to film short segments; Jack Black has also been confirmed, though in what role it's hard to guess. The project does currently lack two essentials: a distributor and financier. But considering Fincher is planning on working with the animator who created the mind- blowing title sequence for . Unless, of course, you're talking about sequels, remakes and spinoffs, in which case there can be just about as many version of . Luckily for fans of immortality, . They may want to work on a new tag line, though. Release Date/Year: Unknown'House Party'Attached: N/AStatus: Way back in 1. Kid 'n Play kicked off a surprise franchise with . Horror: A Genre of Remakes. Why does Hollywood make so many horror movie remakes? The history of film is a history of adaptation. Studios capitalize on previous successes, or sparks of originality that have low- risk profit potential. Horror is no different and possibly a shade more conspicuous in this regard. Even so- called masterpieces produced by the major studios cannot boast original content. For instance, both Psycho (1. The Exorcist (1. 97. The movies proved to work just as well, if not better, on the screen than on the page, so naturally Hollywood squeezed more dollars out of them, by churning out sequels and after enough time had passed ! All of them hacks!!! Stealing content from previously published works has been a hallmark of cinematic horror from the beginning. Two of the earliest horror movies, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1. Der Golem (1. 92. The former was from a Broadway play and the latter an adaptation of an earlier film by the same name. The appeal of remaking the silent classic was chiefly due to the advancement of filmmaking technology, which included the advent of sound in motion pictures. Remakes of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1. 92. 0) became a cinematic tradition as early as 1. That year’s version is still the most lauded, winning critical acclaim at the time of release and in the decades since. Even Universal’s iconic Dracula (1. German silent film, Nosferatu (1. So outside of filling studio coffers, what value can remakes serve? They often utilize technology previously unavailable, such as advances in effects and cinematography, to make a more believable experience for the viewer. This was the case with Dracula (1. In some cases, in addition to utilizing the latest technology, the remake can simply be better than the first: Greater funding, more believable acting, more intriguing storyline, etc . Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1. But more importantly (to this writer) remakes keep classic characters in our collective cultural consciousness. More Blood! More Boobs! Let’s take one of horror’s most enduring icons: Frankenstein. The original Frankenstein was released in 1. Universal. It was an instant horror sensation and proclaimed as a masterpiece by posterity. But it was hardly original. The movie was an adapted version of a Mary Shelley novel by the same name and the behavior of the monster closely mimicked Der Golem. Nevertheless, the . It was remade in 1. Hammer Studios in the UK under the title, The Curse of Frankenstein. Although not a masterpiece, it’s use of vivid color and gore was revolutionary in it’s own right. The next year, Hammer did a remake of Dracula (also based on a novel). Both were big hits, just like the originals. Catching the scent of American greenbacks, Hammer went on to remake, not just the sequels to Frankenstein and Dracula, but the movies featuring the most famous Universal monsters, including Phantom of the Opera, The Mummy and The Wolfman. The Hammer remakes updated them with more gruesome effects, enhanced sexuality and story twists, sucking in a new generation on the prowl for a good scare. For the genre, the impact was enormous. Hammer revitalized the classic monsters, keeping them in our cultural consciousness. Universal has recently been attempting to do the same once more for today’s youth and if the motive is money, who cares? These are greats that deserve to be passed on and live through the ages. The same has happened in the recent past with more contemporary horror icons. Much like Hammer waited about 2. Frankenstein, Dimension Films waited until almost 3. Halloween (1. 97. Like The Curse of Frankenstein, the 2. Halloween featured new twists to the story and updated effects that would appeal to a more desensitized audience. But most importantly, the Halloween remake passed on fear of the quintessential boogeyman to a new generation. New Line Cinema did the same with Jason in 2. And just as the original Friday the 1. Halloween. The remake of the former was much weaker than the remake of the latter. A History of Copycats. But we aren’t simply witnessing a renaissance of remakes mysteriously stirred by the advent of a new millennium. Remakes have always been ubiquitous amongst the horror genre. Here’s just a few notable ones in quick succession: The Blob (1. The Blob (1. 95. 8); The Fly (1. The Fly (1. 95. 8); The Thing (2. The Thing (1. 98. The Thing From Another World (1. I am Legend (2. 00. The Omega Man (1. The Last Man on Earth (1. The Invasion (2. 00. Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1. Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1. Ripping off our Trade Buddies. With the explosion of horror that has taken place in East Asia over the last twenty years, it has become fertile ground for studios searching for new moneymaking schemes. As a result, audiences have been treated to remakes of a number of foreign horror films. Although film snobs deride the remakes, many are just as scary as their foreign counterparts. For example, the 2. American remake of the Japanese horror film The Ring (1. There are several reasons to celebrate the phenomenon of foreign film remakes. For one they make the horror more accessible to a broader audience. Some people don’t mind subtitles, but others are irritated by them and will look for a scare in their own language (the nerve!). Regardless, seeing people who appear to be just like us, right down to the way they talk, experience terrifying moments makes us feel the fear all the more deeply. The foreign horror movies bring fresh scares into our cultural subconscious from . Remakes of them expand the audience exposed to those scares and broadens the reach of horror in our minds and collectively. It’s all just crap! There are some god- awful remakes of horror films. Like many original movies can be poorly executed, so can remakes of otherwise great movies. Take The Grudge (2. Although based on an intensely creepy Japanese film, Ju- on (2. American version only succeeded in bastardizing the original (even if it did spread the profit potential of the concept to American markets). But lets look at the other side of that coin: I don’t think there is a horror fan alive who would not agree that The Thing (1. The Thing From Another World (1. Not only were effects updated in a revolutionary way, but the plotline was more unforgiving and a very dark theme pervaded the entire feature allowing viewers to feel the terror like they couldn’t possibly with the first one. Then there’s the 2. A Nightmare on Elm Street, which surpassed the original in none of these ways. Like some more original horror movies, some remakes are just plane crap. But the poorly done remake tends to bother us more, because there is the added gripe that the remake isn’t even . Moreover, for those who were fans of the first one, the remake can sully it in a way that makes it difficult for us to enjoy the original ever again, thus adding a double outrage. Personal experience: Since Ju- on is quite possibly the creepiest film ever made, I have berated myself for carelessly letting the American version inflict a memory of awfulness on me that I am now reminded of whenever I sit down to watch the original. Therefore, because of that one experience, ALL REMAKES SUCK! Just like with the original, the remake kept my attention rapt from start to finish and left me shocked and awed.* If I had let my experience with Ju- on sour me on remakes I never would’ve discovered that gem of a scare. At the same time, from what I’ve heard, the 2. The Wicker Man, which I have never seen and hopefully never will see, does nothing but defecate on one of the greatest and truly original horror films of all time. Now that you’ve read this crap ? Since remakes are as old as horror itself we either learn to accept them or we end up rejecting a large chunk of the genre outright on shear moral principle. If we hold our concept of what is right and proper too narrowly, we deprive ourselves of films that are as darkly grotesque as The Fly (1. The Curse of Frankenstein (1. The Thing (1. 98. If that’s the way you want to go that’s fine, but I would rather exercise judgment on a case by case basis. Here’s a little advice when deciding whether or not to watch a remake: Get to know the director’s previous works, check out the cast and funding behind the production and always addictively scan the reviews of popular horror websites like HFN.* –.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2017
Categories |